Managing Project Scope Creep
Partnering – Companies may partner to achieve
specific business objectives by maximizing the effectiveness of each
participant’s resources (Wang 2016, as cited by Safapour and Kermanshachi, 2019).
The institution Manager could have included neighboring institutions to assist
in the service. This would expand the human resources and skill set and lessen
fatigue on other team members.
Front-end planning - This is the process through which owners develop sufficient strategic information to address risk and commit resources to maximize project success. (Hwang, 2012 as cited by Safapour and Kermanshachi, 2019). A risk analysis would identify these risk factors in the initial planning phase, including all stakeholders in the planning, and brainstorming on these risk factors will help to identify needed resources and implement these on time to maximize success.
Risk assessment is the process used to identify, assess, and manage risk. The project team evaluates risk exposure for potential project impact to provide focus for mitigation strategies (Jannadi, 2003, as cited by Safapour and Kermanshachi, 2019). The project team could have used a qualitative risk assessment to identify the types of risk and strategize against them. Tiusanen (2017) says that “qualitative risk analysis is a management technique concerned with examining the probability of a risky event and the impact of the risk if it occurs”. Risk was analyzed in the planning meetings, and strategies were implemented to manage them successfully, but other critical areas, for example, the size of the food service team, were not considered to adequately support the project goals without causing employee fatigue. All risks have both probability and impact that characterize the risk.
Nelson (2007) says that underestimating and producing overly optimistic schedules set a project up for failure. Poor estimation also puts excessive pressure on team members, leading to lower morale and productivity. The manager needed to look carefully at the tasks required by our institution and, in turn, develop a larger team to support these needs. This practice should be avoided when managing projects. In closing, project mangers must expect the unexpected and use good judgement in manging scope creeps if they arise.
References
Nelson, R. R. (2007). IT project management: Infamous
failures, classic mistakes, and best practices. MIS Quarterly executive, 6(2).
Tiusanen, R. (2017). Qualitative risk analysis. Handbook of
Safety Principles, 463-492.
Safapour, E., &
Kermanshachi, S. (2019, June). Identifying manageable scope creep indicators
and selecting best practice strategies for construction projects. In Proceedings of the 7th CSCE International Construction Specialty Conference (pp. 12-15).


Comments
Post a Comment